Comparison

    LinkPilot vs Password Pusher

    A workspace alternative to Password Pusher with audit logs, file attachments, branded short links, and a public API.

    Password Pusher is a well-loved open-source tool for sharing passwords via expiring URLs. It supports view-count caps, expiry windows, deletable links, and self-hosting, and it's been a standard in IT and engineering teams for years.

    Where it stops short is everything around the password itself. There's a per-link deletable URL, but no per-tenant audit trail; there's a hosted version, but no real team workspace with RBAC; there's a file-pushing module, but no unified workspace that also covers branded short links and analytics.

    LinkPilot covers the same expiring-secret use case — passphrase, expiry, view-count, deletable URL — and pairs it with team workspaces, tenant-scoped audit logs, file attachments behind signed URLs, branded short links, and a public API.

    LinkPilot is different from a pure secret-sharing tool. It pairs a first-class burn-after-read primitive (passphrase-protected, expiring, file attachments, atomic row-locked reveal) with a full short-link platform — branded domains, real-time analytics, audit logs, RBAC, and an API — all in the same tenant-isolated workspace. Secret contents are kept on a separate workflow from analytics, so passwords and tokens never enter campaign data.

    Feature comparison

    Feature LinkPilot Password Pusher
    Expiring secret URL
    View-count cap (burn after N views) Burn-after-read (N=1) Configurable N
    Configurable expiry 5 minutes to 30 days Up to ~90 days (configurable)
    Passphrase protection Yes — hashed client-side Yes
    Manual delete / revoke
    File attachments Yes — signed URLs Yes (file push module)
    Per-secret audit timeline Created, viewed, burned, revoked Limited
    Per-tenant audit logs
    Team workspaces + 5-role RBAC Limited
    Notification on view
    IP-binding / view restrictions
    Branded short links in same workspace
    Link analytics Privacy-first
    Public API Yes (open API)
    Self-hosting Hosted SaaS Open-source available
    Hashed-IP recipient privacy Standard
    Multi-tenant isolation (RLS) N/A (per-instance)

    Pricing tiers, side by side

    Password Pusher details as published July 2026 — plans change; verify current pricing with the vendor.

    Free

    LinkPilot

    Secret links + short links + analytics

    Password Pusher

    Hosted free + open-source

    Starter

    LinkPilot

    Higher secret cap + branded domain

    Password Pusher

    Sponsorship / self-hosted

    Growth

    LinkPilot

    RBAC + audit logs + file attachments

    Password Pusher

    Self-host required for team controls

    Agency

    LinkPilot

    Multi-workspace + white-label

    Password Pusher

    Not offered

    Which should you pick?

    Choose LinkPilot if…

    • You want a team workspace with RBAC and tenant-scoped audit logs.
    • You want secret sharing and branded short links in the same product.
    • You want hashed-IP recipient privacy and a per-secret audit timeline.
    • You don't want to run your own server or maintain a self-hosted instance.
    • You need IP-binding or view restrictions beyond a simple view-count cap.

    Choose Password Pusher if…

    • Self-hosting is a hard requirement (compliance, air-gapped, etc.).
    • You want a single-purpose tool with nothing else attached.
    • You're happy with view-count caps and don't need a per-secret audit timeline.
    • Your team is small enough that per-tenant RBAC and audit logs aren't needed.

    Why teams switch

    • Per-tenant audit logs and per-secret event timelines come standard.
    • RBAC, file attachments, and branded short links in one product.
    • Hashed-IP recipient privacy without any extra configuration.
    • Hosted SaaS — no instance to run, patch, or back up.

    Migration in 4–5 steps

    1. Identify the password / file shares you regularly create.
    2. Set up a LinkPilot workspace and invite the team with appropriate roles.
    3. Recreate any shared templates (expiry windows, view caps) as conventions in LinkPilot.
    4. Keep Password Pusher running until in-flight links expire, then deprecate.

    The verdict

    Password Pusher is a great open-source tool if you can self-host; LinkPilot is the better pick if you want a hosted workspace with audit trails, RBAC, and branded short links alongside the secret-sharing primitive.

    FAQ

    Can I self-host LinkPilot like Password Pusher?

    No — LinkPilot is hosted SaaS. If self-hosting is a hard requirement, Password Pusher is the better fit.

    Does LinkPilot support view-count caps?

    LinkPilot's primary primitive is burn-after-read (N=1) with optional passphrase, expiry, and IP-binding. For specifically-N-views semantics, Password Pusher is the closer match.

    Can I attach files?

    Yes — file attachments sit behind the same burn / passphrase / expiry controls as text secrets and are served via short-lived signed URLs.

    Are secrets isolated per tenant?

    Yes — every secret is stored in a multi-tenant database with row-level security policies that enforce tenant boundaries on every query.

    Do you offer a public API?

    Yes — scoped REST API (lp_live_* keys) plus webhooks for secret and link events on every paid tier.

    How does pricing compare?

    Password Pusher is free / sponsorship-funded when self-hosted. LinkPilot is a paid SaaS with a generous free tier; you trade hosting effort for a workspace product.

    Other comparisons

    Switching from Password Pusher? Import your links from CSV in minutes — free.